Build the controls once. Attest as many times as you need.
Your customers each want a different attestation against largely the same underlying controls. We implement that control set once in your environment, keep the evidence current, and map it to whichever framework is in front of you — so the second one costs a fraction of the first.
Software does the mapping, collection, and tracking. Credentialed practitioners handle scoping, risk decisions, and everything that needs judgment.
You’re not doing compliance once. You’re doing it over and over.
A prime wants CMMC. Microsoft wants an SSPA data protection review. A commercial customer wants SOC 2. A health client wants HIPAA. Each one arrives as a separate project, usually with a deadline attached, and each one gets rebuilt from scratch by whoever has the least on their plate that month.
The same work, repeated
Most frameworks overlap heavily. Rebuilding the evidence per framework means paying several times for one body of work.
It decays the moment it’s done
A binder assembled for an assessment is stale within a quarter. Then the next affirmation comes due and nobody trusts what’s in it.
You have to sign it
Someone attests that what you wrote is true. If the evidence behind it won’t hold up, that signature is the exposure — not the paperwork.
Build it once, maintain it continuously, and project it across frameworks. That’s the whole idea — and it’s why the second framework should never cost what the first one did.
Implement once. Attest many.
One canonical control library in your environment, with crosswalks projecting it into each framework’s language and evidence format. Add a framework, not a project.
Federal contracting
Driven by DFARS, the coming FAR CUI rule, and prime flow-downs.
Export control
Where the data itself carries jurisdictional restrictions.
Customer and commercial
Driven by who you sell to and what data you touch.
We implement and prepare — we don’t grade. Greypike is not a C3PAO, a CPA firm, or a QSA, and for FedRAMP and GovRAMP we provide readiness and advisory work rather than authorization. That separation is deliberate: it’s what keeps the work we do for you defensible when someone independent comes to verify it.
The program, not just the paperwork.
Take the whole practice or the pieces you’re missing. Most of it runs continuously; roadmaps and assessments are scoped per engagement.
Compliance roadmap and gap assessment
Where you actually stand against what you owe, objective by objective — with a prioritized plan, a scope determination, and an honest read on effort. Written so you can act on it whether or not you hire us.
Per engagementThe Greypike Compliance App
Your control set, your evidence, your status — in one place instead of a spreadsheet and a shared drive. Maps one implementation across every framework you owe and tracks what’s current and what’s drifting.
SubscriptionControl implementation and evidence
We configure the controls in your environment and collect the evidence as a by-product of running it — not by scrambling the month before an assessment.
OngoingSSP, POA&M, and policy library
The documents an assessor actually reads, written for your environment and kept current as it changes. Owners, dates, and status on every open item — no orphaned POA&M entries.
OngoingAssessment and audit readiness
Evidence packages, walkthrough prep, and someone in the room who has done this before. We prepare you for the assessor — we don’t play the assessor.
Per engagementOngoing program management
A named practitioner owning the calendar: reviews, training, risk assessments, affirmations, and reporting your leadership can read. Compliance as a running function, not an annual fire drill.
OngoingEvidence is easier when the security is real.
You can run compliance on its own, and plenty of clients start there. But the fastest programs are the ones where the controls actually exist and produce their own evidence — instead of being reconstructed for the assessor.
Fed by Cybersecurity
Monitoring, training, and vulnerability management generate the artifacts your frameworks ask for as a by-product of running. Same work, counted twice.
CybersecuritySmaller inside an enclave
Scope is what makes compliance expensive. Contain the data and most of your business falls outside the boundary you have to evidence.
Secure EnclaveSomeone to sign behind
Scoping calls, risk acceptance, and affirmations are decisions, not paperwork. A vCISO makes them and answers for them.
vCISOStart here
Find out what you actually owe.
Start with a scoping session. We’ll work out which frameworks apply to you, what’s genuinely in scope, and how much of it you’ve already done without realizing. No obligation.
Veteran-founded · Cyber AB RPA-led · Government contractors only
